On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:28:46PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:Yeah, but my paper didn't really track companies very well. The lwn.net article is the best, and below is my version of who did things in 2.6.23. Note, the lack of a company is not an indicator that they did nothing, just that I could not easily determine someone worked for them. I'll try to send out my "who are you working for" emails in a week or so to see if I can further categorize the "unknowns". thanks, greg k-h ------------------------- Processed 7075 csets from 992 developers 126 employers found Top changeset contributors by employer (Unknown) 1116 (15.8%) (None) 843 (11.9%) Red Hat 827 (11.7%) IBM 557 (7.9%) Linux Foundation 528 (7.5%) Novell 449 (6.3%) Intel 242 (3.4%) Oracle 158 (2.2%) MIPS Technologies 143 (2.0%) Nokia 133 (1.9%) NetApp 119 (1.7%) NTT 99 (1.4%) Astaro 97 (1.4%) MontaVista 90 (1.3%) (Consultant) 86 (1.2%) SGI 84 (1.2%) Qumranet 74 (1.0%) QLogic 70 (1.0%) (Academia) 70 (1.0%) SWsoft 64 (0.9%) Analog Devices 61 (0.9%) HP 60 (0.8%) Sony 59 (0.8%) rPath 56 (0.8%) XenSource 53 (0.7%) CERN 49 (0.7%) CC Computer Consultants 48 (0.7%) Freescale 47 (0.7%) Fujitsu 47 (0.7%) Tripeaks 46 (0.7%) linutronix 44 (0.6%) Snapgear 39 (0.6%) Simtec 34 (0.5%) Atmel 28 (0.4%) Google 28 (0.4%) Cisco 27 (0.4%) Toshiba 25 (0.4%) Broadcom 25 (0.4%) SteelEye 24 (0.3%) Renesas Technology 23 (0.3%) Mellanox 21 (0.3%) LSI Logic 17 (0.2%) Adaptec 16 (0.2%) Wipro 15 (0.2%) Marvell 14 (0.2%) Miracle Linux 14 (0.2%) Solid Boot Ltd. 14 (0.2%) AMD 12 (0.2%) Hitachi 11 (0.2%) ARM 11 (0.2%) Canonical 10 (0.1%) XIV Information Systems 9 (0.1%) OpenedHand 9 (0.1%) Open Grid Computing 9 (0.1%) Veritas 8 (0.1%) Secretlab 7 (0.1%) Neterion 7 (0.1%) Katalix Systems 7 (0.1%) SANPeople 7 (0.1%) Digi International 7 (0.1%) Znyx Networks 6 (0.1%) Wind River 6 (0.1%) NEC 6 (0.1%) Wolfson Microelectronics 6 (0.1%) SUNY Computer Science 6 (0.1%) NetXen 6 (0.1%) NVidia 6 (0.1%) Myricom 6 (0.1%) Chelsio 5 (0.1%) Realtek 5 (0.1%) IPUnity-Glenayre 5 (0.1%) Linux Networx 5 (0.1%) Barco 4 (0.1%) SIOS Technology 4 (0.1%) MIPS 4 (0.1%) University of Aberdeen 4 (0.1%) PiKRON s.r.o 4 (0.1%) Pardus 4 (0.1%) Crash Barrier 4 (0.1%) Tresys 4 (0.1%) ClusterFS 4 (0.1%) Macq Electronique 3 (0.0%) OLPC 3 (0.0%) CompuLab 3 (0.0%) DENX Software Engineering 3 (0.0%) Embedded Alley Solutions 3 (0.0%) Twin Sun 3 (0.0%) Transmode Systems 3 (0.0%) Cosmosbay~Vectis 3 (0.0%) Pengutronix 2 (0.0%) Sierra Wireless 2 (0.0%) Real-Time Remedies 2 (0.0%) Bull 2 (0.0%) ScaleMP Inc. 2 (0.0%) Samsung 2 (0.0%) MicroGate Systems 2 (0.0%) Atomide 2 (0.0%) US National Security Agency 2 (0.0%) VMWare 2 (0.0%) Verismo 2 (0.0%) Akamai Technologies 2 (0.0%) CE Linux Forum 2 (0.0%) Siemens 1 (0.0%) ONELAN 1 (0.0%) Xorcom 1 (0.0%) EXOSEC 1 (0.0%) LWN.net 1 (0.0%) Texas Instruments 1 (0.0%) Promise Technology 1 (0.0%) VA Linux Systems Japan 1 (0.0%) University of Sevilla 1 (0.0%) Motorola 1 (0.0%) HES-SO Valais Wallis 1 (0.0%) SYSGO 1 (0.0%) Via 1 (0.0%) Telecom-Service 1 (0.0%) Hauppauge 1 (0.0%) DSA 1 (0.0%) Vivecode 1 (0.0%) Mandriva 1 (0.0%) ATRON electronic 1 (0.0%) Cytronics & Melware 1 (0.0%) M&N Solutions 1 (0.0%) Rockwell 1 (0.0%) 8D Technologies 1 (0.0%) University of Cambridge 1 (0.0%) -
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg KH | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
