Yeah, but my paper didn't really track companies very well. The lwn.net
article is the best, and below is my version of who did things in
2.6.23. Note, the lack of a company is not an indicator that they did
nothing, just that I could not easily determine someone worked for them.
I'll try to send out my "who are you working for" emails in a week or so
to see if I can further categorize the "unknowns".
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------
Processed 7075 csets from 992 developers
126 employers found
Top changeset contributors by employer
(Unknown) 1116 (15.8%)
(None) 843 (11.9%)
Red Hat 827 (11.7%)
IBM 557 (7.9%)
Linux Foundation 528 (7.5%)
Novell 449 (6.3%)
Intel 242 (3.4%)
Oracle 158 (2.2%)
MIPS Technologies 143 (2.0%)
Nokia 133 (1.9%)
NetApp 119 (1.7%)
NTT 99 (1.4%)
Astaro 97 (1.4%)
MontaVista 90 (1.3%)
(Consultant) 86 (1.2%)
SGI 84 (1.2%)
Qumranet 74 (1.0%)
QLogic 70 (1.0%)
(Academia) 70 (1.0%)
SWsoft 64 (0.9%)
Analog Devices 61 (0.9%)
HP 60 (0.8%)
Sony 59 (0.8%)
rPath 56 (0.8%)
XenSource 53 (0.7%)
CERN 49 (0.7%)
CC Computer Consultants 48 (0.7%)
Freescale 47 (0.7%)
Fujitsu 47 (0.7%)
Tripeaks 46 (0.7%)
linutronix 44 (0.6%)
Snapgear 39 (0.6%)
Simtec 34 (0.5%)
Atmel 28 (0.4%)
Google 28 (0.4%)
Cisco 27 (0.4%)
Toshiba 25 (0.4%)
Broadcom 25...