On Sun, Oct 14, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:... It is a bit naive for you to believe you can remove your GPL distributed work from the internet by deleting it from your server. If your kernel driver work would be merged into the kernel it would retain your copyrights and Signed-off-by: attributions, so it would be visible for everyone that it is your work. If you can't live with that, then why on earth did you join a project developing software released under the GPL? Why did you release your own software under the GPL? Since you seem obsessed with keeping control over your work it is funny that you mention BSD, as the BSD license is even less restrictive than the GPL. Johannes -
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
