Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 13

Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@...>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
Date: Saturday, October 13, 2007 - 7:16 pm

On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 01:13 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

I guess that proves it.... that should have read: 
  ... so I'm _not_ quite sure.


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 12, 4:51 pm)
[RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 6:51 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Kay Sievers, (Mon Oct 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Lennart Poettering, (Mon Oct 15, 10:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Dmitry Adamushko, (Mon Oct 15, 9:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 15, 9:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 3:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 5:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 14, 2:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 7:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 6:11 am)