Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Saturday, October 13, 2007 - 4:16 pm

On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 01:13 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

I guess that proves it.... that should have read: 
  ... so I'm _not_ quite sure.


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 12, 1:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 12:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 1:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 3:11 am)
[RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 3:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 4:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 13, 4:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick, Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 13, 11:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Dmitry Adamushko, (Mon Oct 15, 6:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 15, 6:57 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Lennart Poettering, (Mon Oct 15, 7:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer, Kay Sievers, (Mon Oct 15, 2:32 pm)