Re: static LSM objection

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kees Cook
Date: Friday, October 12, 2007 - 3:20 pm

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:42:27PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

Through the magic of greylisting (thanks vger) and IRC, I've just had a
chat with Arjan and GregKH about this stuff.  So, just to follow up for
people interested in watching me talk to myself:

- while an LSM must be compiled in, they are not mutually exclusive,
  and the desired module can be selected at boot-time.

As such, I don't have any strong objections.  It'd be nice for folks
doing LSM development to allow for a way for it to be modular, but I'll let
them fight for that.  :)

Sorry for the noise,

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
static LSM objection, Kees Cook, (Fri Oct 12, 2:42 pm)
Re: static LSM objection, Kees Cook, (Fri Oct 12, 3:20 pm)