On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 17:50 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
quoted text
> In case of somebody opens a file with dentry_open(dentry, NULL, ...) we don't
> want to stumble on the NULL pointer mnt in struct file. 
...
quoted text
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ void mnt_drop_write(struct vfsmount *mnt
>         int must_check_underflow = 0;
>         struct mnt_writer *cpu_writer;
> 
> +       if (!mnt)
> +               return;

I kinda wish we'd fix these in the callers.  I know we do something
similar to this with mntput(), but I worry a bit that this just
discourages people from using the right interfaces.

Do you have a case where we're actually getting a NULL mount in here?
We had at least one in reiser4 that really revealed some nastiness in
the fs that needed fixing.

-- Dave

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/