Re: Linux 2.6.23

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:46 pm

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:


hm, i understood that peak remark to be in reference to FreeBSD's 
scheduler (which the FreeBSD guys are primarily interested in 
obviously), not v2.6.21 - but i could be wrong.

In any case, there is indeed a regression with sysbench and a low number 
of threads, and it's being fixed. The peak got improved visibly in 
sched-devel:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/misc/sysbench-sched-devel.jpg

but there is still some peak regression left, i'm testing a patch for 
that.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.23, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Oct 9, 1:54 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Nicholas Miell, (Tue Oct 9, 11:12 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, René Rebe, (Wed Oct 10, 12:44 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Oct 10, 1:37 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Michael Tokarev, (Wed Oct 10, 2:12 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 10, 3:14 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Oct 10, 3:36 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 10, 3:53 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Michael Tokarev, (Wed Oct 10, 4:13 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Oct 10, 12:14 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Michael Tokarev, (Wed Oct 10, 12:26 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Andi Kleen, (Wed Oct 10, 1:04 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Krzysztof Halasa, (Wed Oct 10, 4:27 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Nicholas Miell, (Wed Oct 10, 6:20 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed Oct 10, 7:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Nick Piggin, (Thu Oct 11, 2:16 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Oct 11, 6:32 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Nick Piggin, (Thu Oct 11, 7:15 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Oct 11, 10:46 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.23, Bill Davidsen, (Fri Oct 12, 5:21 am)