[PATCH 4/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...>
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 6:00 pm

The system currently evaluates all online CPUs whenever one or more enters
an rt_overload condition.  This suffers from scalability limitations as
the # of online CPUs increases.  So we introduce a cpumask to track
exactly which CPUs need RT balancing.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
CC: Peter W. Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c |   12 +++++++++---
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 0ca3905..41b0e9c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ static inline struct rq *this_rq_lock(void)
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
 static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_t rt_overload;
+static cpumask_t rto_cpus;
 #endif
 
 static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -640,8 +641,11 @@ static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 	if (rt_task(p)) {
 		rq->rt_nr_running++;
 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-		if (rq->rt_nr_running == 2)
+		if (rq->rt_nr_running == 2) {
+			cpu_set(rq->cpu, rto_cpus);
+			smp_wmb();
 			atomic_inc(&rt_overload);
+		}
 # endif
 	}
 #endif
@@ -654,8 +658,10 @@ static inline void dec_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 		WARN_ON(!rq->rt_nr_running);
 		rq->rt_nr_running--;
 # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-		if (rq->rt_nr_running == 1)
+		if (rq->rt_nr_running == 1) {
 			atomic_dec(&rt_overload);
+			cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rto_cpus);
+		}
 # endif
 	}
 #endif
@@ -1590,7 +1596,7 @@ static void balance_rt_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu)
 	 */
 	next = pick_next_task(this_rq, this_rq->curr);
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, rto_cpus) {
 		if (cpu == this_cpu)
 			continue;
 		src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/7] RT: (RFC) RT-Overload/Sched enhancements , Gregory Haskins, (Thu Oct 11, 5:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] RT: (RFC) RT-Overload/Sched enhancements, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 12, 6:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] RT: (RFC) RT-Overload/Sched enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] RT: (RFC) RT-Overload/Sched enhancements, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Oct 12, 7:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] RT: (RFC) RT-Overload/Sched enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Oct 12, 9:20 am)
[PATCH 7/7] RT: push-rt enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Thu Oct 11, 6:00 pm)
[PATCH 5/7] RT: CPU priority management, Gregory Haskins, (Thu Oct 11, 6:00 pm)
[PATCH 4/7] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication, Gregory Haskins, (Thu Oct 11, 6:00 pm)
[PATCH 1/7] RT: Push waiting rt tasks, Gregory Haskins, (Thu Oct 11, 5:59 pm)