login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
11
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fixup
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Alan Cox <alan@...>
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fixup
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 3:55 pm
> So when I change the above code snippet to:
quoted text
> > + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE)) { > + printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n", > + smp_processor_id()); > + return; > > Would this make the whole patch acceptable then?
I think the fundamental direction is wrong. "Do you have a machine check like facility" is a CPU specific question that belongs in the CPU specific code. If some of that CPU specific code is wrong, fix it there. Alan -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2] x86: MCE optimization and cleanups
, Joerg Roedel
, (Thu Oct 11, 8:17 am)
[PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fixup
, Joerg Roedel
, (Thu Oct 11, 8:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Thu Oct 11, 9:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Christoph Egger
, (Thu Oct 11, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Thu Oct 11, 10:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Oct 11, 11:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Christoph Egger
, (Thu Oct 11, 11:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Oct 11, 3:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Thu Oct 11, 12:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Christoph Egger
, (Fri Oct 12, 3:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fi...
, Dave Jones
, (Thu Oct 11, 1:30 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] x86: mce minor indent cleanup
, Joerg Roedel
, (Thu Oct 11, 8:17 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
James Bruce
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Peter Zijlstra
[PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
Jan Engelhardt
intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
Peter Zijlstra
[RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options
Rick Jones
Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Josip Rodin
bnx2_poll panicking kernel
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
714 guests
online.
Online users
maxicv84
shiatsumassager
spinalaidhudson
Syndicate