Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Kevin <spaceman__spiff@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Olof Johansson <olof@...>, Greg KH <gregkh@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@...>, Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@...>, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...>, Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...>, Mark Lord <mlord@...>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...>, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, <akpm@...>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...>, <stable@...>, <alan@...>, BDFL <volkerdi@...>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > And I think I see the problem: it's a config change. You don't have
> > PM_LEGACY enabled. Your config file diff shows:
> >
> > -CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y
> > +# CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is not set
> >
> > I suspect we should make CONFIG_APM either depend on, or select,
> > PM_LEGACY. But as far as I can see, nothing has actually changed in this
> > area in the kernel, and this bug has been there before - just your config
> > change made it appear.
> >
> > Rafael? Stephen? Opinions? I'd think that making APM depend on
> > CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is the right thing to do these days..
>
> Speaking as the author of
>
> [PATCH] move pm_register/etc. to CONFIG_PM_LEGACY, pm_legacy.h
>
> I agree. arch/i386/kernel/apm.c clearly requires
> include/linux/pm_legacy.h and the legacy PM API.
>
> I would vote for a dependency rather than select, but don't have any
> strong feelings on the matter...
gti revert 987d4613e52e4f655278265aabbcc69237018b1d
should do the trick.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
