Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 12:15 pm

On 10/11/07, Johannes Weiner <hannes-kernel@saeurebad.de> wrote:

In short, the reason for disallowing multiple lines per call is that
printk() will be less complex, while not really changing the
complexity of the callers (a change in the code, yes, but the changes
are trivial, and, actually, not that many).

I think I see now, though, that my changes will not gain support if I
do not lift this restriction.

You can find my current "mysterious later changes" as patches, with
descriptions, at this address: http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/xprintf/

Thanks for the tip, though. I am quite new to the kernel business, so
bear with me :)

Kind regards,
Vegard Nossum
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Vegard Nossum, (Wed Oct 10, 11:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Oct 11, 8:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Oct 11, 8:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Oct 11, 9:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Oct 11, 9:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Oct 11, 9:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Johannes Weiner, (Thu Oct 11, 10:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] init: Fix printk format strings, Vegard Nossum, (Thu Oct 11, 12:15 pm)