Re: coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Oleg Verych
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 8:26 am

On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:14:29AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[] 

printk() problem was discussed with proper banana userspace replacement
proposition by me, so i don't care much.

Though, why MCE can't be enabled/disabled by config option? Native
engineers from proper company should know what processors have this
feature... If kconfig isn't flexible for this, i'm glad to hear
opinions. If it's needed anyway, then sorry.
____
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2] i386: MCE updates, Joerg Roedel, (Tue Oct 9, 5:49 am)
[PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change, Joerg Roedel, (Tue Oct 9, 5:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Oct 9, 1:46 pm)
Re: coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cl ..., Oleg Verych, (Thu Oct 11, 8:26 am)