Markus Rechberger schrieb:
quoted text
> On 10/11/07, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
>> Markus Rechberger a écrit :
>>> On 10/11/07, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>> As such, the old and decrepit em28xx driver seems more useful to people,
>>>> since at least it supports the limited set of hardware on its own.
>>> it does not since it's broken and feature limited. On the other side
>> I have a device which works perfectly with it if you add the vendor and
>> product ID to the list. I don't really call that broken. And it doesn't
>> need a firmware.
>>
> 
> Aurelien,
> 
> the device you're using is around 2 years old. You're one of the lucky
> ones, I have tonns of support mails in my mail account from people who
> own almost a similar device but with different videodecoders which are
> not fully supported in the kernel or which worked and got broken
> during the time.
> It took me around 4 hours to debug such an issue last years remotly
> with an enduser (which includes that noone cared to ask me if I'm fine
> with such an update, neither did someone ask people who own such
> devices that they should test the changes).
> Please also take other devices and upcoming devices into account,
> since i'm willing to spend that time and since I'm in contact with
> various companies who provide several components of those devices.
> 
>> Please think that a lot of persons do not have enough knowledge to
>> compile out of tree drivers, and that a lot more do not even know about
>> this out of tree driver.
>>
> 
> this is what all is about, the project does not depend on certain
> broken drivers anymore. And people who initially disagreed without
> having any solution nor contributed any code can continue to play
> their game without having an impact on that driver anymore.
> 
> Markus

markus,

its the same old story you are telling over and over again.

of course there might be a huge community builded up the
last month @ mcentral,
of course your driver supports newer devices,

BUT

the same old story is - and you always miss that part

we discussed a lot on your changes and also ACCEPTED those
for merging, if you would have changed your UNNECCESSARY touching
of dvb-core. its proven that things could work without that
nacked change to dvb core. but, you decided to stop discussion then,
and went away to perform your own tree/userspace thing.

as linus and andrew stated within this thread they think they will not 
merge your code like it is cause of different reasons,
i am wondering a bit whats your next step is.

regards
marcel

ps. as linus tells from time to time
"It's not just black and white - there's also grey"

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/