On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:52:04PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Go for it, I just stole that out of the detection code. That
could be changed accordingly as well at some point (I'm guessing
for_each_node_by_name didn't exist when that was written).
Yep. I'll leave that to people who have hardware access. :-)
Thanks,
-Olof
-