login
Header Space

 
 

Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@...>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 9:40 am

On 10/8/07, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:

Some minor rewording suggestions:

---

Replace the last sentence with "I am satisfied with the submitter's
response to my comments." or "The submitter has responded to my
comments in a way that satisfied my concerns."

---
---

I would suggest dropping the "(or may not)" as unnecessary, and
changing the "which would" to "that would".

---
---

From a legal standpoint, "I do not" might be preferable to "I cannot",
since it disclaims any intention to make such a statement, regardless
of qualification.

---
---

(e) seems over-careful, especially since you're applying it only to
the Review-by tag, while all the other tags would also have the same
concern.



-- 
scott preece
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Oct 8, 1:24 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Mark Gross, (Mon Oct 8, 2:40 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Mon Oct 8, 2:53 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Al Viro, (Mon Oct 8, 3:05 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight , Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Oct 8, 3:08 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Oct 8, 1:37 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight , Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Oct 8, 6:43 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Scott Preece, (Wed Oct 10, 9:40 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Mon Oct 8, 7:42 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, J. Bruce Fields, (Mon Oct 8, 7:30 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Alan Cox, (Tue Oct 9, 6:28 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Oct 8, 7:06 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Oct 8, 11:34 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Oct 8, 1:45 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Oct 8, 4:33 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Theodore Tso, (Mon Oct 8, 5:38 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Oleg Verych, (Mon Oct 8, 7:20 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Oct 8, 6:18 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Scott Preece, (Mon Oct 8, 3:35 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Roland Dreier, (Mon Oct 8, 2:40 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Mon Oct 8, 2:26 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 8, 2:01 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Oct 8, 2:06 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Mon Oct 8, 2:34 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, J. Bruce Fields, (Mon Oct 8, 2:52 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Scott Preece, (Mon Oct 8, 3:26 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Oct 8, 4:16 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 8, 10:07 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Tue Oct 9, 2:11 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Oct 9, 2:27 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Tue Oct 9, 2:39 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Tue Oct 9, 2:47 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Stefan Richter, (Mon Oct 8, 3:04 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 8, 2:16 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Pekka Enberg, (Mon Oct 8, 1:31 pm)
speck-geostationary