On Oct 10 2007 14:36, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
quoted text
>> >> --- linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h.vanilla
>> >> +++ linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h
>> >
>> >> +struct super_block;
>> >>  extern void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *);
>> >>  void drop_pagecache(void);
>> >>  void drop_slab(void);
>> >>
>> >> You probably end up fixing it some other way, but as I do not know this
>> >> file inside out I just wanted to drop a note.
>> >
>> > You have some strange vanilla kernel. 2.6.23 doesn't have this prototype.
>>
>> The same happens here as well.
>>
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 mjt mjt 45488158 Oct  9 20:48 linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2
>> 2cc2fd4d521dc5d7cfce0d8a9d1b3472  linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2
>>
>> (timestamp is in UTC) Downloaded yesterday, 3 hours after an announce,
>> from http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 .
>
>Strange. Same size, same md5, no super_block in mm.h, though

Does someone still have the broken tarball?

There has not been any drop_pagecache_sb anytime between 2.6.23-rc1
and 2.6.23. drop_pagecache_sb reminds me of reiser4, too.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/