Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 1

Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, David Bahi <dbahi@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-rt-users@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Gregory Haskins <GHaskins@...>
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386
Date: Monday, October 1, 2007 - 6:07 pm

> OTOH, the accounting hook would allow us to remove the IRQ#0 -> CPU#0

Some SIS chipsets hang the machine when you migrate irq 0 to another
CPU. It's better to keep that Also I wouldn't be surprised if there are some
other assumptions about this elsewhere.

Ok in theory it could be done only on SIS, but that probably would really
not be worth the trouble

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, David Bahi, (Wed Sep 26, 2:03 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Andi Kleen, (Mon Oct 1, 1:36 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 1, 2:54 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Andi Kleen, (Mon Oct 1, 3:16 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 1, 3:27 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 1, 3:56 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 1, 5:17 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Andi Kleen, (Mon Oct 1, 5:41 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 1, 5:58 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Andi Kleen, (Mon Oct 1, 6:07 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Oct 1, 6:47 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Andi Kleen, (Tue Oct 2, 1:51 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Oct 2, 2:18 am)
RE: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Fri Oct 5, 12:37 am)
RE: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Oct 5, 4:37 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Mika Penttilä, (Tue Oct 2, 12:56 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Oct 2, 1:00 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Oct 1, 6:52 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Oct 1, 4:11 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386, Dave Jones, (Mon Oct 1, 4:10 pm)