Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <nickpiggin@...>, <hch@...>, <mel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <dgc@...>, <jens.axboe@...>
Date: Monday, October 1, 2007 - 5:38 pm

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:


SLAB cannot pack objects as dense as SLUB and they have different 
algorithm to make the choice of order. Thus the number of objects per slab 
may vary between SLAB and SLUB and therefore also the choice of order to 
store these objects.


Upstream SLUB uses order 0 allocations for the radix tree. MM varies 
because the use of higher order allocs is more loose if the mobility 
algorithms are found to be active:

2.6.23-rc8:

Name                   Objects Objsize    Space Slabs/Part/Cpu  O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg\
radix_tree_node          14281     552     9.9M     2432/948/1    7 0  38  79

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 18, 11:36 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 1:33 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 4:50 pm)
SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 12:16 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 1:38 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 4, 1:50 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 4:48 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Schwartz, (Thu Oct 4, 7:39 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 7:49 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Schwartz, (Fri Oct 5, 12:18 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 4:58 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 5:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 5:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Oct 4, 2:26 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 2:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 1:49 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 3:28 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 4:55 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 5:02 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 5, 4:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Fri Oct 5, 5:31 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 5:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 5:47 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 6:07 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Chinner, (Thu Oct 4, 6:23 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 2:48 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Oct 5, 7:56 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 3:27 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 8:37 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Oct 5, 5:19 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 5:28 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Andi Kleen, (Fri Oct 5, 7:12 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 8:39 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 3:31 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 3:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 5:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 10:43 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 4, 10:53 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 3:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Siddha, Suresh B, (Thu Oct 4, 3:46 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 5:10 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 2:20 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 5:01 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 4:55 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 5:38 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 5:52 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 2:41 pm)