Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, Jonathan Campbell <jon@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, October 1, 2007 - 10:28 am

Lennart Sorensen wrote:

And in a perfect world everyone would have a mail client which made that 
easy, no one would be force by company policy or other circumstances to 
use a client which didn't work the way you think it should, no company 
or ISP would filter and mangle outgoing mail, and all vendors would 
understand that pristine patches are more important that all that stuff 
they do to make business communications look reasonable.

In my world people send me attachments so they don't get mangled, and if 
I need to quote them I know how to do so.

And reading them, many show attached text at the end of the message and 
make turning it into inline text simple.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2...., Jonathan Campbell, (Mon Sep 24, 4:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Bill Davidsen, (Mon Oct 1, 10:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Jonathan Campbell, (Wed Sep 26, 2:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Jonathan Campbell, (Wed Sep 26, 7:44 pm)