RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 - 8:25 pm

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:

Earlier I used latency_trace and figured that there was read contention
on mm->mmap_sem during call to _rt_down_read by java threads
when I was running volanomark.  That caused the slowdown of the rt
kernel
compared to non-rt kernel.  The output from lock_stat confirm
that mm->map_sem was indeed the most heavily contended lock.

Tim
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch, Chen, Tim C, (Wed Jan 3, 8:25 pm)