> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Monday August 21,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no wrote:
> > >
> > > Could we instead replace it with a dprintk() that returns the value of
> > > "res"? That will keep it useful for debugging purposes.
> >
> > (only 5 months later...)
> >
> > Sure, how about this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > NeilBrown
>
> ACKed.
>
> Thanks Neil!
>