Jeff Garzik wrote:Well, the "docs" I was using was a half-finished, broken version of the driver released by NVidia which had to be significantly revised, and the public ADMA spec which the hardware was vaguely based on and which a few things could be inferred from. If NVidia had just released the docs it would have been much easier, I would have gladly written it from scratch. There are still things in the driver that could likely be improved if we had the actual hardware documents, registers that we don't know what half the bits are for, etc. Having the vendor release a driver without hardware information is fine, as long as it works perfectly or they maintain it when bugs are found. Otherwise, anyone else trying to fix it will end up with an exercise in "why was it doing this? should it be doing this instead?" -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Matt Mackall | Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
