Roland Dreier wrote:You were complaining about drivers that work on only one platform. Thus, I asked for list of said drivers, drivers that break Greg's pledge. I'm betting they are uniformly ancient ISA or m68k or whatnot drivers. Translation: you don't have a clue what you are talking about, because you haven't even bothered to do such a search yourself. This is /your/ criteria we are discussing. /You/ keep talking about "many" (your words) non-portable and broken drivers. And now you actively avoid citing examples. Oh, except for one: aha154x, an ancient ISA driver. So, yes, I concede that if a vendor appears and wants to push in a new driver for ancient ISA hardware that nobody in the planet uses... it might not find a volunteer. Hooray for goofy examples. And hooray for shifting arguments. If this is your summary of the thread, do you now concede that Greg was not being disingenuous? Open specs was not the sum toto of Greg's piece. Jeff -
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Con Kolivas | [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 |
git: | |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 03/17] vbus: add connection-client helper infrastructure |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 03/30] solos: FPGA and firmware update support. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
