On Tuesday 30 January 2007 17:24, you wrote:
quoted text
> The bug described back in 2004 in the following message still seems to 
exist:
quoted text
> 
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-05/4313.html
> 
> Essentially, it appears that if a process sleeps before it uses up a
> complete jiffy then no charge is made to its process accounting table.
> 
> This problem still exists in the same manner in kernel:

This is a known limitation of tick based accounting used on most 
architectures. 
It was fixed on s390 and using a cpu timer on every context switch. (IIRC ppc 
is now using this infrastructure as well)

see for a http://www.kernel-traffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20041117_284.html#8
for the first patch in the series.

I dont know if there are plans of using the infrastructure on x86 compatible 
platforms. I also dont know it that is actually easy to implement with x86 
hardware. 




-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Christian Borntraeger
Linux Software Engineer zSeries Linux & Virtualization



-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/