Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:31:20 -0800
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> 
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 14:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>> As Christoph says, it's very much preferred that code be migrated over to
>>>> kmap_atomic().  Partly because kmap() is deadlockable in situations where a
>>>> large number of threads are trying to take two kmaps at the same time and
>>>> we run out.  This happened in the past, but incidences have gone away,
>>>> probably because of kmap->kmap_atomic conversions.
>>>> From which callsite have you measured problems?
>>> CONFIG_HIGHPTE code in -rt was horrid. I'll do some measurements on
>>> mainline.
>>>
>> CONFIG_HIGHPTE is always horrid -we've known that for years.
> 
> We have?  What's wrong with it?  <looks around for bug reports>

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0307.0/0463.html

July 2003.


M.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/