Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gautham R Shenoy
Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 - 8:17 am

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:34:59PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:

We would still be needing this patch as it's complementing what Oleg has
posted.

Thanks and Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race, Andrew Morton, (Tue Jan 2, 5:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race, Gautham R Shenoy, (Wed Jan 3, 7:04 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race, Gautham R Shenoy, (Wed Jan 3, 8:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race, Oleg Nesterov, (Wed Jan 3, 10:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race, Gautham R Shenoy, (Wed Jan 3, 9:30 pm)