login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ak@...>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 - 9:20 am

Adrian,

On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:40:15PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

I am hearing conflicting opinions on this one.

Perfmon is a fairly big patch. It is hard to take it as one. I have tried to
split it up in smaller, more manageable pieces as requested by top-level
maintainers. This process implies that I supply small patches which may not
necessarily have users just yet.


The perfmon patch includes several kernel modules which make use of
the exported entry points. The following symbols are exported:

pfm_pmu_register/pfm_pmu_unregister:
	* PMU description module registration.
	* Used to describe PMU model.
	* Used by perfmon_p4.c, perfmon_core.c, perfmon_mckinley.c, and others

pfm_fmt_register/pfm_fmt_unregister:
	* Sampling format module registration
	* Used by perfmon_dfl_smpl.c, perfmon_pebs_smpl.c

pfm_interrupt_handler:
	* PMU interrupt handler
	* Used by MIPS-specific perfmon code

pfm_pmu_conf/pfm_controls:
	* global state/control variable

All exported symbols are currently used. Why are you saying this adds bloat?

-- 
-Stephane
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3), Stephane Eranian, (Wed Jan 3, 9:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3), Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 3, 7:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3), Stephane Eranian, (Fri Jan 5, 6:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3), Adrian Bunk, (Fri Jan 5, 9:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] add i386 idle notifier (take 3), Stephane Eranian, (Tue Jan 9, 6:49 am)
speck-geostationary