On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
quoted text
> On Monday August 21, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no wrote:
> > 
> > Could we instead replace it with a dprintk() that returns the value of
> > "res"? That will keep it useful for debugging purposes.
> 
> (only 5 months later...)
> 
> Sure, how about this?
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown

ACKed.

Thanks Neil!

Trond

quoted text
> 
> Remove warning: VFS is out of sync with lock manager.
> 
> But keep it as a dprintk
> 
> The message can be generated in a quite normal situation:
>  If a 'lock' request is interrupted, then the lock client needs to
>   record that the server has the lock, incase it does.
>  When we come the unlock, the server might say it doesn't, even
>   though we think it does (or might) and this generates the message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
> 
> ### Diffstat output
>  ./fs/nfs/file.c |    5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff .prev/fs/nfs/file.c ./fs/nfs/file.c
> --- .prev/fs/nfs/file.c	2007-01-29 16:04:09.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./fs/nfs/file.c	2007-01-29 16:04:45.000000000 +1100
> @@ -434,8 +434,9 @@ static int do_vfs_lock(struct file *file
>  			BUG();
>  	}
>  	if (res < 0)
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: VFS is out of sync with lock manager!\n",
> -				__FUNCTION__);
> +		dprintk(KERN_WARNING "%s: VFS is out of sync with lock manager"
> +			" - error %d!\n",
> +				__FUNCTION__, res);
>  	return res;
>  }
>  

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/