Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » January » 29

Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes
Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 - 9:36 am

On Thursday 25 January 2007 22:37, David Rientjes wrote:

That sounds like syntactical vinegar and a nasty trap. Remember 
that venus probe that got lost because of a wrong comma.
Can you find some nicer syntax for that please? 

Also it's pretty complex. Are there use cases for all of this? 

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[patch -mm 1/5] x86_64: configurable fake numa node sizes, David Rientjes, (Thu Jan 25, 5:37 pm)
[patch -mm 2/5] x86_64: split remaining fake nodes equally, David Rientjes, (Thu Jan 25, 5:37 pm)
[patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes, David Rientjes, (Thu Jan 25, 5:37 pm)
Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jan 29, 9:36 am)
Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes, David Rientjes, (Mon Jan 29, 2:38 pm)
Re: [patch -mm 3/5] x86_64: fixed-size remaining fake nodes, David Rientjes, (Mon Jan 29, 9:19 pm)
[patch -mm 4/5] x86_64: fake numa function annotations, David Rientjes, (Thu Jan 25, 5:37 pm)