Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Sergey Vlasov
Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 - 3:26 am

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:55:48AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
=20
e=20

There is module_param_call() - used at least by drivers/md/md.c:

static int get_ro(char *buffer, struct kernel_param *kp)
=2E..
static int set_ro(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
=2E..
module_param_call(start_ro, set_ro, get_ro, NULL, S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR);
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Soeren Sonnenburg, (Sat Jan 27, 6:29 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jan 29, 2:55 am)
Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Sergey Vlasov, (Mon Jan 29, 3:26 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Jan 29, 3:32 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jan 29, 3:40 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jan 29, 4:13 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Jan 29, 4:24 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jan 29, 4:45 am)
Re: 2.6.20-rc6 pb_fnmode regression, Soeren Sonnenburg, (Mon Jan 29, 8:12 am)