Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text > On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:04 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>>> Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter
>>> stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may
>>> still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out
>>> of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream).
>> We definitly should get lockmeter in. Does anyone volunteer for doing
>> the cleanup and merged?
>
> specifically; implementing it on top of lockdep should be very lean and
> simple...
cc: John Hawkes, if we're going to discuss this ;-)
M.
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
lockmeter , Christoph Hellwig , (Sun Jan 28, 1:04 pm)
Re: lockmeter , Martin J. Bligh , (Sun Jan 28, 9:12 pm)