Stephane Eranian wrote:
quoted text > Hello,
>
> I ran into compiler warnings with the perfmon code when I tried
> using test() and __set_bit() on i386.
>
> For some reason, the i386 bitops functions use unsigned long * for
> the address whereas x86-64/ia64 use void *.
>
> I do not quite understand why such difference?
> Is this just for historical reasons?
>
> Thanks.
>
Arguably void * is the right thing for a littleendian architecture. For
bigendian architectures it unfortunately matters what the chunk size is,
regardless of if the chunks are numbered in bigendian (reverse) or
littleendian (forward) order.
-hpa
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: i386 and x86-64 bitops function prototypes differ , H. Peter Anvin , (Fri Jan 26, 10:49 am)