Re: [PATCH] libata: fix combined mode (was Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released))

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan <alan@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 - 5:32 pm

Jeff Garzik wrote:

Without checking for failures, I might add.

Let's call that regression/obvious bug #4, because the previous code 
actually CARED if the resource was reserved.


I agree this is one way to avoid conflicts!  ;-)

	Jeff


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Jan 1, 9:28 am)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 4:13 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Jeff Garzik, (Mon Jan 1, 4:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] libata: fix combined mode (was Re: Happy New Yea..., Jeff Garzik, (Tue Jan 2, 5:32 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 7:34 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Theodore Tso, (Mon Jan 1, 10:32 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jan 2, 12:09 pm)