Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan <alan@...>
Cc: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 - 12:09 pm

On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Alan wrote:

Which weren't a regression or anything new.

Alan: regressions are what we don't do. Ever. If your second patch is 
found to have some other problems, we revert them both. It's that simple. 
It's better to stay in place than walk backwards, even if the "backwards" 
is just for a few people.

So far, it fixed at least Alessandro's problems, so here's to hoping there 
aren't any others..

		Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Jan 1, 9:28 am)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 4:13 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Jeff Garzik, (Mon Jan 1, 4:49 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 7:34 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Theodore Tso, (Mon Jan 1, 10:32 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jan 2, 12:09 pm)