On Jan 1 2007 22:40, Ingo Oeser wrote:
quoted text
>On Monday, 1. January 2007 17:25, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de> writes:
>> > Then this works, because the side effect (+20) is evaluated only once. 
>> 
>> It's not a side effect, it's a non-lvalue, and you can't take the address
>> of a non-lvalue.
>
>Just verified this. So If we cannot make it work in all cases, it will
>cause more problems then it will solve.
>
>So we are left with a function, which will 
>a) only be used by janitors to provide "kfree(x); x = NULL;" 
>    with an macro KFREE(x) in all the simple cases.

Just checking, where has it been decided that we actually are going to have
kfree_nullify() or whatever the end result happens to be called?


Thanks,
	-`J'
-- 
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/