Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <alan@...>
Date: Monday, January 1, 2007 - 4:13 pm

Jeff, 
 what was the resolution to this one? Just revert the offending commit, or 
what?

We're about five weeks into the 2.6.20-rc series. I was hoping for a 
two-month release rather than the usual dragged-out three months, so I'd 
like to get these regressions to be actively fixed. By forcible reverts if 
that is what it takes.

		Linus

On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Alessandro Suardi, (Mon Jan 1, 9:28 am)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 4:13 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Jeff Garzik, (Mon Jan 1, 4:49 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jan 1, 7:34 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Theodore Tso, (Mon Jan 1, 10:32 pm)
Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released), Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jan 2, 12:09 pm)