Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de> writes:

quoted text
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 1. January 2007 07:37, Amit Choudhary wrote:
>> --- Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de> wrote:
>> > #define kfree_nullify(x) do { \
>> > 	if (__builtin_constant_p(x)) { \
>> > 		kfree(x); \
>> > 	} else { \
>> > 		typeof(x) *__addr_x = &x; \
>
> Ok, I should change that line to 
> 		typeof(x) *__addr_x = &(x); \
>
>> > 		kfree(*__addr_x); \
>> > 		*__addr_x = NULL; \
>> > 	} \
>> > } while (0)
>> > 
>> > Regards
>> > 
>> > Ingo Oeser
>> > 
>> 
>> This is a nice approach but what if someone does kfree_nullify(x+20).
>
> Then this works, because the side effect (+20) is evaluated only once. 

It's not a side effect, it's a non-lvalue, and you can't take the address
of a non-lvalue.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/