Rene Herman wrote on 20.08.2008 22:52:Thanks again. I'll try to learn abouth atomic_long_t and if it's really works as I think I'll use them instead of disable irq and locking because it really seems ugly. :) It was misprinting I've ment the following: the function might be called with interrupts enable so if I use PER_CPU variables I have do disable interrups on this CPU. I am really grateful to you for the help. I'll try to improve my patch and resend it. Stanichenko Marat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@nl.linux.org Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 00 of 12] mmu notifier #v13 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Remaining straight forward kthread API conversions... |
| Eric Paris | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Trond Myklebust | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | [PATCH 04/33] Fix {ip,6}_route_me_harder() in netns |
