On 19-08-08 06:25, Mohamed Thalib .H wrote:A slight adjustment might be that there is generally a version that most big distributions agree on (at the moment I believe it's v25) and those will get longer support (and more external patches made ready for it). Might be somewhat easier to support for a bit longer therefore. Whether or not that's important to you ofcourse fully depends on your local use. If you don't expect to upgrade a once-built board for another few years or so anyway, any advantage is gone as by that time any current kernel is obsolete. In that case, "latest" definitely tends to be the best choice. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@nl.linux.org Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Jared Hulbert | [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
