Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Frédéric Brière
Date: Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 10:46 am

Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:

I don't think there would be any reason for this module to exist in a
real-time kernel; AFAIK, its only raison d'être is to enforce a strict
timing that would be impossible in a typical userspace application.


-- 
This dungeon is owned and operated by Frobozz Magic Co., Ltd.

_______________________________________________
Kernel-mentors mailing list
Kernel-mentors@selenic.com
http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-mentors
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Frédéric Brière, (Sat Apr 17, 10:35 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Gary Jennejohn, (Sun Apr 18, 2:40 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Frédéric Brière, (Sun Apr 18, 5:52 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Gary Jennejohn, (Sun Apr 18, 9:23 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Gary Jennejohn, (Sun Apr 18, 9:37 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Matt Mackall, (Sun Apr 18, 10:22 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Frédéric Brière, (Sun Apr 18, 10:22 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Frédéric Brière, (Sun Apr 18, 10:46 am)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Matt Mackall, (Mon Apr 19, 3:53 pm)
Re: Bringing the OpenCBM driver into the staging tree, Frédéric Brière, (Thu Apr 22, 2:38 pm)