On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:04 +1100, aboobacker vadakkumuri valappil
wrote:
quoted text
> Good... Well, i am not sure about your commend about iSCSI. There has
> not been any transport protocols, which is as feature rich and robus
> as iSCSI :) It is the industry standard for SCSI transport. The other
> expensive option  is fibrechannel. iSCSI has been bread and butter for
> a lot of storage companies these days.

I know, I used to work with the group that created ScsiTCP, what
eventually became iSCSI.

Writing a basic iSCSI target is not rocket science, especially if you're
starting with something that already talks SCSI. There's an open
standard, freely available sample code, and lots of features you can
ignore.

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux


_______________________________________________
Kernel-mentors mailing list
Kernel-mentors@selenic.com
http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-mentors