Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bryan Henderson
Date: Monday, March 24, 2008 - 9:56 am

You're still being really vague on your requirements.  Sometimes you talk 
about a filesystem that can't be modified after it has been written, and 
other times you talk about a filesystem that can be updated, but only to 
add information.  Sometimes you talk about a read-only restriction that is 
effective against the superuser (not possible) and other times say that 
it's OK if the superuser can modify the filesystem without a trace.

In addition to new ext3 features, using isofs, and chattr, mounting 
read-only and using file permissions also effect read-only status, and 
you'd have to explain how any of these don't meet your requirements.  But 
rest assured that none of them is effective against the superuser.


I couldn't tell what "it" is in this sentence, or what checksums you're 
thinking of.

--
Bryan Henderson                     IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose CA                         Filesystems

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem, Bryan Henderson, (Mon Mar 24, 9:56 am)
Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Mar 25, 8:22 am)
Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem, Bryan Henderson, (Tue Mar 25, 11:32 am)
Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem, Bryan Henderson, (Tue Mar 25, 11:42 am)
Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem, Bryan Henderson, (Wed Mar 26, 9:49 am)