On Feb 12 2008 15:26, David Miller wrote:Ok you do have a point there. The GPT users win of course, since it uses LBA, not cyls, so the number of lost bytes is generally below a cyl. On the other hand, the H and S of CHS could be lowered and S increased, e.g. divide H by 2, divide S by 2, multiply S by 4. This gives a finer bytes/cylinder granularity. Well it was designed for a different system initially with a different style of booting. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Stephen Smalley | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Robin Holt | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1 |
git: | |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Rob Coleman | S3 |
| Ian Kluft | 2nd CFV and VOTE ACK: comp.os.linux reorganization |
