Re: [1/2] POHMELFS - network filesystem with local coherent cache.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 9:04 pm

On Jan 31 2008 22:17, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

A brick is usually something that is in the way -
Or you also say "the user has bricked his machine"
when it's quite unusable :)
Hope you did not mean /that/.


Needs a bigger data set to compare. But what is much more
important: does it use a single port for networing, or some
firewall-unfriendly-by-default multiple dynamic-port-allocation
like NFS?


What will happen when both nodes change an inode in disconnected state?
Which inode wins out?


btrfs is all we need :p


Where's the parallelism that is advertised by the "POH" in pohmelfs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [1/2] POHMELFS - network filesystem with local coherent ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jan 31, 9:04 pm)
[2/2] POHMELFS: hack to disable writeback., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Thu Jan 31, 3:17 pm)