Home » Mailing list archives » linux-fsdevel » 2008 » January » 9

Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Rik van Riel
Subject: Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 7:44 am

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:52:14 +0300
Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:


You can't play fast and loose with data integrity.

Besides, if we looked at things optimistically, we would conclude
that no fsck will be needed, ever :)
 

You will really want to read this paper, if you haven't already.

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Tue Jan 8, 2:41 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Tue Jan 8, 9:40 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Valerie Henson, (Wed Jan 9, 12:45 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Wed Jan 9, 1:04 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Wed Jan 9, 4:52 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Wed Jan 9, 7:44 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Thu Jan 10, 6:26 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Theodore Tso, (Sat Jan 12, 7:51 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Sun Jan 13, 4:05 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Pavel Machek, (Sun Jan 13, 10:19 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Alan Cox, (Sun Jan 13, 10:41 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Daniel Phillips, (Sun Jan 13, 5:22 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Ric Wheeler, (Mon Jan 14, 6:04 pm)
[Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremen ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Jan 15, 1:16 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., David Chinner, (Tue Jan 15, 2:43 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Jan 15, 4:07 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Daniel Phillips, (Tue Jan 15, 4:44 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Alan Cox, (Tue Jan 15, 5:15 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Daniel Phillips, (Tue Jan 15, 6:24 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Chris Mason, (Tue Jan 15, 6:36 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Daniel Phillips, (Tue Jan 15, 6:44 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Rik van Riel, (Tue Jan 15, 8:05 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Jan 16, 4:49 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Jan 16, 4:51 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Valdis.Kletnieks, (Wed Jan 16, 5:20 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Jan 16, 9:38 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Valerie Henson, (Wed Jan 16, 1:52 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Eric Sandeen, (Wed Jan 16, 2:28 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Andreas Dilger, (Thu Jan 17, 12:38 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Thu Jan 17, 5:29 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Jan 17, 1:54 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Daniel Phillips, (Thu Jan 17, 3:51 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Jan 19, 7:51 am)