Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <nigel@...>
Cc: <pavel@...>, <akpm@...>, <hch@...>, <serue@...>, <viro@...>, <ebiederm@...>, <kzak@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <containers@...>, <util-linux-ng@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 - 4:47 am

> >> On Tue 2008-01-08 12:35:09, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

This patch has nothing to do with suspend or hibernate.  What this
patchset does, is help get rid of fusermount, a suid-root mount
helper.  It also opens up new possibilities, which are not fuse
related.

Fuse has bad interactions with the freezer, theoretically.  In
practice, I remember just one bug report (that sparked off this whole
"do we need freezer, or don't we" flamefest), that actually got fixed
fairly quickly, ...maybe.  Rafael probably remembers better.


The ability to freeze tasks in uninterruptible sleep, or more
generally at any preempt point (except when drivers are poking
hardware).

I know this doesn't play well with userspace hibernate, and I don't
think it can be resolved without going the kexec way.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Wed Jan 9, 5:19 am)
Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse..., Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Jan 9, 4:47 am)