Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...>, Jan Kara <jack@...>, Chris Snook <csnook@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 2:20 am

Andreas Dilger wrote:

32mb.


Setting size=400 doesn't help, nor does size=4.


The big difference between ordered and writeback is that once the slowdown 
starts, ordered goes into ~100% iowait, whereas writeback continues 100% 
user.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Fri Jan 25, 2:47 am)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jan 30, 8:32 pm)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Al Boldi, (Thu Jan 31, 2:20 am)