Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Kara <jack@...>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, January 28, 2008 - 4:17 pm

Jan Kara wrote:

Ok, that's a special case, which we could code for, but doesn't seem 
worthwile.  In any case, child-forks should inherit its parent mode.


I don't think so, but these tests are only meant to expose the underlying 
problem which needs to be fixed, while this RFC proposes a useful 
workaround.

In another post Jan Kara wrote:

8M-record insert into indexed db-table:
         ordered  writeback
sqlite3:  75m22s    8m45s
mysql4 :  23m35s    5m29s

Also, see the 'konqueror deadlocks in 2.6.22' thread.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Fri Jan 25, 2:47 am)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Al Boldi, (Mon Jan 28, 4:17 pm)
Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode, Andreas Dilger, (Wed Jan 30, 8:32 pm)