Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...>
Cc: <neilb@...>, <jengelh@...>, <kzak@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <util-linux-ng@...>, <linuxram@...>, <viro@...>, <hch@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2008 - 11:36 am

On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:


I introduced /proc/self/mountstats because we need a way for non- 
block-device-based file systems to report I/O statistics.  Everything  
else I tried was rejected, and apparently what we ended up with was  
reviewed by only a handful of people, so no one else likes it or uses  
it.

It can go away for all I care, as long as we retain some flexible  
mechanism for non-block-based file systems to report I/O stats.  As  
far as I am aware, there are only two user utilities that understand  
and parse this data, and I maintain both.

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts, Neil Brown, (Wed Jan 16, 8:33 pm)
Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Jan 17, 4:55 am)
Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts, Chuck Lever, (Thu Jan 17, 11:36 am)
Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Jan 16, 9:17 pm)