Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Mason
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 - 6:36 pm

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:24:27 -0500
"Daniel Phillips" <phillips@google.com> wrote:


We've had mount -o barrier=1 for ext3 for a while now, it makes
writeback caching safe.  XFS has this on by default, as does reiserfs.

-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Tue Jan 8, 2:41 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Tue Jan 8, 9:40 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Valerie Henson, (Wed Jan 9, 12:45 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Wed Jan 9, 1:04 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Wed Jan 9, 4:52 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Rik van Riel, (Wed Jan 9, 7:44 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Thu Jan 10, 6:26 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Theodore Tso, (Sat Jan 12, 7:51 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Al Boldi, (Sun Jan 13, 4:05 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Pavel Machek, (Sun Jan 13, 10:19 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Alan Cox, (Sun Jan 13, 10:41 am)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Daniel Phillips, (Sun Jan 13, 5:22 pm)
Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck, Ric Wheeler, (Mon Jan 14, 6:04 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Chris Mason, (Tue Jan 15, 6:36 pm)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Jan 16, 9:38 am)
Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incr ..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Thu Jan 17, 5:29 am)